jump to navigation

Life of the Mind (Hofstadter) 22 February 2007

Posted by Todd in Academia & Education, Commentary, Philosophy & Social Theory.
comments closed

I’ve just begun reading Richard Hofstadter’s seminal work from 1964, Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. Needless to say, he was a brilliant thinker and writer, who died far too young, as did many of the best public intellectuals of the mid-20th century. I’ll be posting more about the book in the near future. Here’s a witty example of Hofstadter’s sly, understated style:

“But in a world full of dangers, the danger that American society as a whole will overesteem intellect or assign it such a transcendant value as to displace other legitimate values is one that hardly need trouble us.”

And here is a part of Hofstadter’s discussion of what makes one an “intellectual”:

“[The intellectual] may live for ideas … but something must prevent him from living for one idea, from becoming obsessive and grotesque. … When one’s concerns for ideas, no matter how dedicated and sincere, reduces them to the service of some central limited preconception or some wholly external end, intellect gets swallowed by fanatacism. If there is anything more dangerous to the life of the mind than having no independent commitment to ideas, it is having an excess of commitment to some special or constricting idea. … [So] we speak of the play of the mind; and certainly the intellectual relishes the play of the mind for its own sake … The curiosity of the playful mind is inordinately restless and active … [which] gives a distinctive cast to its view of truth and its discontent with dogmas. … Whatever the intellectual is too certain of, if he is healthily playful, he begins to find unsatisfactory. The meaning of the intellectual life lies not in the possession of the truth but in the quest for new uncertainties.”

Advertisements

Good News! 18 February 2007

Posted by Todd in Academia & Education.
comments closed

My 2nd year tenure dossier has officially been accepted by the Provost at my university. The tenure process can be mysterious and downright vexing, but I’m lucky to be at an institution with a transparent and well-documented process, so you know where you are every step of the way. We have big university dossier reviews on even years, with tenure being awarded (if all goes well) following the 6th year. During odd years, there is a mini, college-level review. So this was my first big hurdle toward tenure.

I am worried about the amount of research and community service I’m able to accomplish given the crushing teaching load at my university (this despite the Chancelor’s insistence that we work less and are paid more than our peer universities…but that’s a digression). Talking with colleagues, I’m on track; but I should’ve had this manuscript finalized early last fall, and here I am writing lectures on a Sunday trying to figure out how I’m going to send the re-revised manuscript in by the end of the week. What a mess.

But the take home message is, Hooray! Made it through the first major tenure hoop.